Dave Fulk, CEO of Reputation Rhino, helps leaders repair, protect and take control of their online reputation.
Public relations once focused on optics and perception. A company could issue a statement or run a media campaign and move the needle on how it was viewed. That era is gone.
Today, online reputation management is about operations, not optics. Trust is often decided instantly through AI-generated search results, review platforms and social channels that move faster than press releases ever could. A single fake review, misleading AI summary or viral TikTok video can undo months of carefully crafted messaging.
This new environment demands more than spin. Companies must put systems in place to track how AI presents their brand, verify that reviews are authentic and protect executives from digital impersonation.
Reputation is no longer just a story a company tells. It is an infrastructure that must be built, maintained and protected. The following five trends show where leaders can act now to safeguard credibility moving forward.
AI-Shaped Search And The Rise Of ‘Answer Engines’
Google’s AI Overviews have fundamentally altered how consumers discover and evaluate businesses. However, AI summaries can canonize misinformation, including fake contact numbers that cost consumers hundreds of dollars when they call scammers instead of legitimate businesses.
The shift to “zero-click” experiences means reputational narratives are increasingly aggregated and presented without users visiting original sources. While Google maintains that AI-driven clicks deliver higher quality engagement, businesses face a new reality where their reputation depends on how AI systems interpret and synthesize scattered online information.
What To Do Now: Build an “answer graph” strategy. Publish verifiable facts on owned properties with structured data markup. Create dedicated press pages and executive biography sections with clear, factual information. Monitor AI-generated summaries for your brand terms weekly, and establish escalation procedures for corrections when AI systems surface inaccurate information.
Review Authenticity Crackdown
Regulatory enforcement around fake reviews has shifted from warnings to penalties. The FTC’s Consumer Reviews and Testimonials Rule, effective October 21, 2024, authorizes civil penalties for businesses that use deceptive reviews or testimonials. Meanwhile, Amazon blocked 275 million suspected fake reviews in 2024, signaling intensified platform-level enforcement.
Across the Atlantic, EU Digital Services Act enforcement is ramping up slowly, with some national regulators conducting compliance reviews of major platforms. This regulatory convergence creates a compliance-grade environment, creating formal compliance obligations and reporting requirements.
What To Do Now: Centralize review governance with logging systems, response time standards and compliance documentation. Eliminate incentivized review programs, and train affiliate partners on regulatory requirements. Prepare evidence packages that demonstrate legitimate review acquisition for potential platform or regulatory inquiries.
Gen-Z’s Trust Equation: Values, Proof And Platform-Native Signals
Review platforms capture only part of how younger consumers evaluate brands. Research shows that 84% of consumers need to share values with brands they support, with Gen-Z showing a strong correlation between personal identity and brand choice. This generation often discovers brands through social video platforms, where Americans getting news on TikTok grew fivefold since 2020, from 3% to 17% in 2024.
Reviews remain necessary but insufficient. Social proof now includes creator commentary, explainer videos and community discussions that shape reputation outside traditional review ecosystems. I’ve noticed Gen-Z also applies a sharper filter for authenticity. They are often quick to spot brand missteps and verify claims through peers, comments or creators before forming an opinion.
Traditional ad campaigns rarely move this group unless paired with transparent storytelling and proof of impact—such as sustainability pledges backed by measurable progress. In my experience, the brands that succeed with Gen-Z tend to elevate employee voices, showcase real customer experiences and partner with credible creators who command trust within their communities.
Authenticity, not polish, defines influence here. With many adults regularly consuming news through social media platforms, platform-native content can be a critical reputation factor.
What To Do Now: Map trust signals across platforms where your customers consume information. Create TikTok and YouTube content that addresses frequently asked questions about your business. Publish brand values with supporting evidence like policies, sustainability reports and community impact metrics. Establish proactive response protocols for misinformation spreading through social channels.
From Reviews To Verifiable Content
The review ecosystem is experimenting with authentication mechanisms as AI-generated fake reviews become more sophisticated. Academic research explores blockchain-enabled review verification, while machine learning advances improve automated detection of fraudulent reviews. These technologies remain largely experimental, with challenges around user experience and adoption.
The movement toward verifiable content extends beyond reviews to all brand communications. I’ve noticed that content provenance, which involves documenting the origin and authenticity of digital content, is becoming standard practice as AI-generated content proliferates across the web.
What To Do Now: Implement content authenticity signals, starting with provenance metadata on official communications. Pilot purchase-verified review systems where technically feasible. Document content moderation processes and measure trust metrics like click-through rates on authenticated versus standard content.
Reputation Security: Deepfakes And Impersonation
Brand and executive impersonation through AI-generated audio and video represents an emerging threat category. A survey indicates that approximately 49% of businesses encountered deepfake fraud in 2024, with many cases involving significant financial losses. AI-powered scams are targeting businesses with growing sophistication, exploiting voice cloning and video generation.
These attacks can damage both immediate business operations and long-term reputation. When executives appear to endorse fraudulent schemes or make controversial statements through deepfake content, the reputational impact persists even after the content is identified as fake.
What To Do Now: Add “reputation security” protocols to standard online reputation management practices. Train executives on verification scripts for high-stakes communications. Create a public “official channels” directory listing legitimate social media accounts and contact methods. Implement watermarking or origin verification for executive video content. Establish cross-functional incident response procedures that link communications, legal and security teams.
The Operational Era Of Reputation Management
Online reputation management in 2025 is no longer a series of one-off fixes. It has become integrated trust operations that connect search monitoring, review compliance, platform-native proof, content authenticity and reputation security.
I think the companies that treat these as daily disciplines rather than reactive moves will be the ones that keep credibility intact. Action beats optics. Ship the system, then iterate. Put the framework in place now. Get it working, and improve it as new risks arise.
Forbes Business Council is the foremost growth and networking organization for business owners and leaders. Do I qualify?
