Dmitrii Khasanov is an angel investor, digital marketing expert and founder of Arrow Stars.
When OpenAI confirmed its backing for Critterz, an almost fully AI-generated animated feature scheduled to debut at Cannes in 2026, the company said the picture would be delivered in roughly nine months for “under $30 million.” That figure is extraordinary: Pixar and Illumination typically spend $100–200 million and multiple years on comparable titles, according to publicly reported budgets for recent releases such as Elemental and The Super Mario Bros. Movie.
If Critterz lands on time and on cost, studio finance teams in Los Angeles and London will be forced to revisit every green-light model they use.
Why The Budget Gap Matters
The appeal of generative AI begins with operating leverage. Morgan Stanley Research projects that GenAI can trim overall media-production expenses by about 10% and cut costs in television and film by as much as 30% when the technology is fully integrated into scripting, pre-visualisation and post-production workflows.
Industry veteran Jeffrey Katzenberg goes further, predicting a 90% reduction in both labor and schedule for high-end animation once AI pipelines mature. If even the more conservative Morgan Stanley scenario prevails, a studio that spends $200 million on a tent-pole today could bank $60 million in savings on its next outing.
Savings already show up in live projects. Netflix used generative tools to create a major collapsing-building shot for its upcoming series El Eternauta; Co-CEO Ted Sarandos told analysts the sequence was completed “10 times faster” than it would have been with conventional VFX. Speed and cost reduction on that scale change cash-flow dynamics, allowing producers to iterate concepts more frequently and lower the break-even point for every release.
Shifting Capital And Competitive Dynamics
Lower barriers invite fresh capital. Venture funds that previously avoided feature animation because of lengthy payback periods are now exploring AI-native studios, whose budgets resemble mid-range software projects rather than blockbuster films. Hardware and cloud providers also benefit. Each percentage point of labor savings shifts to new demand for GPUs and cloud inference; Nvidia and hyperscale clouds become silent equity partners through multiyear compute contracts.
Strategically, regions that bundle reliable renewables with flexible data-sovereignty rules, such as Canada’s Hydro-Québec corridor, are positioning themselves as AI-production hubs. Conversely, U.S. states that award tax credits mainly for on-set labor hours risk losing projects. Wrapbook notes that New Jersey and several peer jurisdictions have already begun to debate whether (and how) to count AI-assisted work toward incentive thresholds.
Labor And Regulatory Headwinds
Efficiency gains carry social costs. The 2023 Hollywood writers’ and actors’ strikes centered on AI safeguards and ultimately produced contractual language that limits studio use of generative tools to augment, not replace, creative labor. If Critterz proves that a sub-$30 million animated feature can rival traditional output, pressure on animation guilds will intensify. Katzenberg’s 90% projection translates directly into fewer artist hours unless retraining and revenue-sharing models are established.
Regulators are watching. The forthcoming EU AI Act will require provenance disclosure for synthetic media assets. Compliance adds audit costs and exposes studios to legal claims if their training data contains unlicensed IP. U.S. copyright law remains unsettled on whether AI-generated images infringe when source data is scraped without permission. Litigation risk must therefore be priced into any investment that relies on closed or proprietary models.
Will AI-First Filmmaking Scale?
Skeptics argue that Critterz is a loss-leader—a well-funded research demonstration designed more for publicity than profit. That view underestimates the structural incentives. If Morgan Stanley’s 30% cost-reduction scenario is accurate, studios gain an immediate margin benefit even after accounting for added cloud and compliance expenditure. Moreover, capital markets reward faster time-to-cash; shortening the production cycle from three years to one accelerates revenue recognition and lowers present-value risk.
The larger unknown is audience reception. Early AI-heavy shorts attract curiosity but sometimes suffer from visual sameness. My own test screenings suggest that hybrid workflows, such as AI for layout and lighting and humans for key character animation and emotion, produce higher engagement scores than fully synthetic scenes. That hybrid approach could become the industry norm: AI handles volume; artists handle nuance.
Investment Thesis And Due-Diligence Checklist
From an investor’s perspective, AI in film should be analyzed as a supply-chain transformation rather than a pure creative revolution. Key diligence items include:
• Data Licensing: Confirm that training datasets carry explicit usage rights; unlicensed libraries create open-ended liabilities.
• Compute Exposure: Fixed-price GPU contracts hedge against volatile spot-market rates that could erode cost savings.
• Labor Covenants: Agreements with guilds must specify residuals for AI-assisted workflows to prevent production stoppages.
• Regulatory Trajectory: Track EU and U.S. rule-making on synthetic media; non-compliance can disqualify tax subsidies and delay releases.
• Audience Testing: Allocate budget for early focus groups; AI’s speed advantage is moot if the end product fails to meet quality benchmarks.
Trend Or PR Stunt?
I see Critterz not as a one-off experiment but as an early inflection point. Cost differentials that large invite imitation, and the underlying tools, like diffusion models, large language frameworks and automated lip-sync, are becoming commodity APIs. Hollywood and major European studios could therefore adopt AI not only for savings but also to diversify risk across a broader film slate.
I believe the decisive factor will be whether stakeholders share the upside. If artists receive fair residuals and regulators ensure transparent training data, AI may democratize production and unlock new storytelling voices. If savings accrue solely to platforms and cloud providers, we risk a two-tier market in which mid-scale studios disappear and creative labor bears the squeeze.
Either way, the economics have changed. The question is no longer whether AI will enter filmmaking, but how its gains and pains will be allocated across the industry’s value chain.
Forbes Business Council is the foremost growth and networking organization for business owners and leaders. Do I qualify?
